Tempted by God
No one, when tempted, should say, "I
am being tempted by God"; for God cannot be tempted by
evil and he himself tempts no one.
(James 1:13)
I just became aware of one of the
devil's greatest schemes by which he can automate his entire system
of tempting us to evil. His technique is so effective that not only
does he leverage his ability to keep us in a vicious cycle of falling
for temptations repeatedly, but he does so by accessing the most
basic part of our creation design, our very purpose of existence. By
doing this he also escapes detection as being detected as the origin
of our temptations and causes us to shift blame over onto God.
It can be easy to be content with a
simplistic interpretation of this verse. But James is not simply
insisting that we should never use these words, “I am being tempted
by God.” The problem is not in whether or not we use this phrase or
assume that God might be tempting us to do something that is wrong.
Rather the diabolical subtlety of Satan's scheme is to tamper with
our innermost beliefs about what God is like and who He really is and
gain control over us through that means.
The more I think about this the more
the effectiveness of this scheme becomes evident. Rather than
repeatedly tempting us to do the same messed up things we so easily
fall for, he instills into our subconsciousness distorted images of
the God we believe Him to be. Thus he arranges a predisposition for
failure in a bed of lies about God ,perceptions of Him that are
perverted, twisted and reinforced by widely accepted notions about
Him we are not even aware are wrong and so seldom even question.
In this way Satan masks the things that
really tempt us with temptations to obvious evil that too often have
compulsive power that we find very difficult to resist. W may just
give up and keep falling as easy prey, or we may work up will power
relying on self-help techniques or popular spiritual formulas to
teach ourselves (with divine assistance) to get our behavior in line
with religious standards. But we are still unaware that mainstream
religious ideas of what it means to reflect God are themselves
already prostituted and in actuality mirror more the character of
Satan than the character of the God of heaven who is love.
What I have discovered is that many, if
not most of our temptations are not the real temptations that take us
down. For instance, if I am tempted in a way that from my perspective
is actually a call of God to do something in His name to further His
kingdom on earth, then how can I resist or even desire to resist such
a temptation? Satan has effectively captured my conscience to
manipulate in his scheme and I am not even aware that my reflection
of God's image has been hijacked. No wonder so many of us remain
stuck feeling unable to become more like Jesus.
Let me give an example. If I believe
that it is my God-appointed duty to raise my children fearing the
Lord, yet I believe that such fear means belief in a dualistic
concept of God as both threatening as well as loving, and I treat
others that same way myself, what might be a hidden trap in that sort
of thinking? An I simply raising what I hope to be godly children
based on mainstream beliefs that God rewards the good and issues
threats of dire punishments from His hand if anyone steps too far out
of line?
This in fact is the way I and far too
many other people were raised. But in recent years God has been
alerting me to the fact that in reality this view of Him is the
after-effects of my first parent's choice to embrace the entire
system represented by the forbidden Tree in their garden. By eating
from that Tree, more importantly they became infected with a
diabolical internal picture of God and His ways of relating to His
children. Now the internal picture of God in each of us became
perverted by the principles of evil of that Tree rather than the
principles of life represented by the Tree that was rejected.
Since it is unavoidable that we treat
others and even ourselves based on the internal picture we have of
the kind of God who in charge of our lives, then rather than needing
to tempt us directly to do things outside of what is healthy or good
for us or others, all Satan has to do is to keep our perceptions of
God in turmoil and we will default to living according to the
standards of the god we imagine Him to be.
Whether or not we think Satan even
exists matters little within this scheme; what matters is that we
remain trapped in believing that we are defending what we assume is
truth, righteousness and decency while in reality, if we would allow
ourselves to see things the way heaven sees them, we would discover
that much of what we defend in the name of religious 'truth' and
moral decency is in fact riddled with faulty assumptions. And all
this can be traced back to the original slander against God's
character that is now embraced as religious facts about Him that must
never be questioned.
I learned an important principle years
ago that has helped me begin to see how such a scheme could be so
effective. I learned that the sins we talk about and the temptations
we assume trouble us so easily, leading us to indulge in bad
behaviors, are often not the same kinds of temptations Jesus faced. I
had puzzled for years over the teaching that Jesus was tempted in
every point just as we are, yet clearly was never tempted to smoke or
drive too fast in a car or many other things we face today. I
pondered if Jesus was even tempted to have sex which is clearly a
temptation for most men. Did Jesus experience overwhelming urges like
a drug addict to take another hit? I don't think Jesus ever suffered
the experience of a torture conscience driving him to look for
something to give Him relief. So how could we insist that He
experienced every temptation known to man (and woman)?
What began to dawn on me was the hidden
diversion underneath so many of our questions. Our emphasis is often
on the wrong thing because we fail to see underlying assumptions
embedded within our questions. This happens so much that even Jesus
often did not answer questions directly, because to do so would only
endorse the faulty reasoning inherent in the question, creating an
inescapable trap either way He answered. This was the crafty intent
of many who dogged His steps much of His life.
Upon realizing this I decided to go
back and more closely examine the evidence to find out just how Jesus
was really tempted. To my amazement I discovered a mistake we make in
our faulty assumptions about the verses that seem to support this
line of logic.
For we do not have a high priest who
is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has
been tempted in every way, just as we are-- yet
was without sin. (Hebrews 4:15 NIV)
What struck me one day was related to
who's temptation we use as the standard of measure for the very
definition of temptation. By starting with the false presumption that
we already know how we are tempted and then projecting our opinions
into this text, we mistakenly conclude that either Jesus was indeed
tempted in every detail exactly what we think we are tempted to do,
leaving us puzzled or very skeptical, or we conclude this verse must
not be true and feel like discarding it as nonsense.
But what if Jesus really was
tempted in every point like I am tempted? I believe that is what this
verse teaches. But do I realize that it is faulty reasoning to use my
own experience and my presumptions about temptation as a standard by
which to judge Jesus and how He was tempted? Wouldn't it make more
sense to lay aside our preconceptions about temptation in order to
investigate and discern the nature of Jesus' temptations so I might
better grasp how I am tempted in the same way He was tempted? When I
did this I discovered a long-hidden reality that made a huge
difference for me.
I found that as I began to discern what
temptation really is based on what I learned about Jesus, and on what
points the real temptations focus, many temptations I assumed were
the problem were actually decoys diverting my attention from the
deeper temptations that I had already fallen to long before.
I am now seeing that the core
temptations ahead of what I experience typically viewed as 'normal'
temptations, are temptations directly affecting my internal beliefs
about what God is like. And the reason we find ourselves so weak in
the face of other temptations is because of our faulty, dark concepts
and beliefs about God that undermines our ability to overcome more
obvious temptations.
If you would ask about anyone questions
regarding what they imagine a temptation looks like, most answers
would be along the lines of something they believe that God would not
do or related to His commands. In other words, if this activity or
attitude is something we don't think God would approve of or would do
Himself, then likely it is something we should not do either but are
tempted to do anyway. That is actually a definition of godliness –
how much we are like the God we imagine.
Now, this may be a very good answer, at
least on the surface. It is this line of logic that was popular with
the WWJD fad a few years ago – What Would Jesus Do? The problem
with that fad was not that we shouldn't seek to emulate Jesus –
every follower of Jesus should be seeking to do that very thing. The
problem is that underneath this valid desire to only do what Jesus
would do is the wide variation of opinions of just what Jesus would
based on opinions in the thinking of people using this motto. If our
concept of God is not in line with the Jesus we discover in the
gospels, then just imitating an ill-informed notion about who He
really was and how He treated people can be very misguided.
Yet how often are we willing to
seriously question our fundamental beliefs about the kind of God we
worship? This can be frightening I know, because for years I
struggled against a willingness to challenge my underlying beliefs
about what God is like. Such thoughts aroused a sense of primordial
fear that to do so would be very dangerous, would be stepping off the
platform of established truth given to me by authority figures in my
life, and the only possible direction from that point would be a
slippery slope toward perdition and a sinful rebellious life. Little
did I realize however, that my internal perception of God was already
deeply infected and riddled with dark notions effectively blocking my
heart from being able to love Him, or anyone else for that matter.
All I knew was that I had been taught to cling to 'the truth' that I
had been taught all my life, and that anything beyond that was too
dangerous and should be shunned at the peril of my eternal destiny.
Yet this very fear is part of the
genius of Satan's scheme for each one of us. To tempt us openly to do
things out of harmony with what we believe God would have us do is
too obvious; but to tempt us with those same things while our deepest
perception of God is immersed in beliefs that His character includes
a dark side that makes us afraid of Him can make us more vulnerable
to other temptations.
Only the real truth about God will
bring the satisfaction that our souls crave. This is key to
appreciating the enormous importance of challenging our feelings and
beliefs about who God is and how He treats us. So long as our
internal version of God remains out of harmony with the version that
Jesus came to reveal, we will find ourselves easy targets fall into
sinful behaviors and choices. The inherent power of any temptation is
that we find it appealing related to some intense but unmet need deep
in our souls. Whether it is a temptation to experience short-lived
pleasure to mask our emptiness or pain, or whether we are tempted to
work hard to keep God happy so He will save us, either way
temptations find their effectiveness by leveraging our mistaken
notions about the kind of God we are supposed to trust.
Let me ask this question. How often do
you suppose a person would define temptation as an enticement to do
something they believe that God would and should do? That almost
sound silly, for if God would do something Himself then it just
follows that to be godly it should be something we would also do. Yet
even as we say this we may begin to feel a little sense of uneasiness
as we begin to think of exceptions; a sense of dissonance begins to
emerge in our hearts. Why is this?
I believe that because we are all born
with a sinful nature, the nature we all inherit through all of our
parents since Adam, it is impossible to begin life with a completely
correct internal concept of God. Certainly some people have better
versions of God, those fortunate enough to be raised in loving homes
where their parents or caregivers are very spiritually mature and are
themselves advanced in having their own concepts of God greatly
improved. Nevertheless we all still start out with inborn selfishness
which simply means that our internal compass originally designed to
steer us toward God has been broken requiring that each of us
requires a personal Savior to connect us with the healing power that
God is longing to plant in our hearts.
The core of this healing that must take
place inside relates to our idea of what God is like and how He
treats us and feels about us. Until that core malfunction is
repaired, no amount of effort to educate, train, discipline,
manipulate or influence our outward behavior will prove very
effective so long as our internal concept of God remains distorted.
We were created to be reflectors of God and we cannot help but do so.
But what we actually reflect is not the real God in heaven but the
god our heart perceives Him to be. Because of this we must pay more
attention to the root cause of our malfunction – our internal
picture of God – rather than spending so much time and effort
trying to fix the external symptoms resulting from this wrong image
of God deep in our soul. So long as our picture of God remains
distorted, then we will believe that we are in fact doing God's will
when in reality it is the will of the wrong god, yet we can't see
that because we resist allowing the true God to show us this.
They will put you out of the
synagogues. Indeed, an hour is coming when those who kill
you will think that by doing so they are offering worship to God.
And they will do this because they have not known the
Father or me. (John 16:2-3)
Can you now see how sly Satan is in
tempting us deeper than what we initially perceive? We imagine that
our temptations are over things our God would not do. But we fail to
see as temptation anything that we believe God would do, so if we
believe He uses violence then we feel justified in doing the same.
We are told that God cannot be tempted.
No one, when tempted, should say, "I am being tempted by
God"; for God cannot be tempted by evil and
he himself tempts no one. (James 1:13) Yet at the same time our
belief systems embrace and teach things about God that in any other
context we would plainly view as evil. So how do we reconcile this
obvious discrepancy? How can we justify believing a God who tells us
to love our enemies and treat them with kindness, yet at the same
time believe He will in the end torture His own enemies with fire to
punish them for not obeying Him? It takes an enormous amount of
self-delusion and twisted reasoning to try to reconcile these
opposite extremes. No wonder sane, logical people turn away from
religion in disgust, for they can see more clearly than most
religious adherents to religion the obvious contradictions in those
beliefs.
The way I have seen we typically try to
rationalize such contradictions is to assert there are simply things
we cannot understand, or that are simply mysterious and it is wrong
to even question them. We call that 'taking it on faith.' But such
faith has nothing to do with the faith that Jesus had.
How convenient. That is the same
argument tyrants and abusers rely on as they exploit others for
selfish purposes. “Just trust us” they say. But as soon as
someone starts throwing around that kind of logic you can be sure
something is likely amiss.
If any of you lacks wisdom, he
should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault,
and it will be given to him. But when he asks, he must believe and
not doubt, because he who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and
tossed by the wind. That man should not think he will receive
anything from the Lord; he is a double-minded man, unstable
in all he does. (James 1:5-8 NIV)
We must come to see that our dualistic
teachings about God are the root cause of double-mindedness. And this
is the reason we see so much instability in the lives of Christians
everywhere, for we are attempting to believe opposing things about
the same God at the same time, something our brains were never
designed to do.
John addresses this same issue. We
declare to you what we have seen and heard so that you also may have
fellowship with us; and truly our fellowship is with the Father and
with his Son Jesus Christ. We are writing these things so that our
joy may be complete. This is the message we have heard from him and
proclaim to you, that God is light and in him there is no
darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with
him while we are walking in darkness, we lie and do not do what is
true; but if we walk in the light as he himself is in the light, we
have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son
cleanses us from all sin. (1 John 1:3-7)
Let me ask this question. If there is
no darkness in God whatsoever, why do we try to insist that
God will do things that would be crimes punishable in just about
every society? I am not suggesting that we should measure God using
systems based on fallen perceptions about justice. But the moral
framework that is still evident in our deepest humanness recoils at
certain things as reprehensible, especially on the part of those who
have not yet been calloused by years of distortions and abuse that
has seared their conscience. And what does the most damage to our
conscience is too often the confusing, conflicting teachings about
God taught as truth and forced into the minds of young people causing
them to lose the image of God in the innocence they had from birth.
Yes, we are all born infected by
selfishness and we all need healing for that. But we are also born
with at least some of the image of the true God that is too often
defaced by those around us pounding into us false ideas that erode
His image as we mature.
There was a song in a broadway musical
years ago called, You've Got to be Taught. It had a profound
message in it that led me to go look it up a few years ago and review
the words. I realized that the writers of that song were expressing
an important insight related to this that too many have missed.
You've got to be
taught
To hate and fear,
You've got to be taught
From year to year,
It's got to be drummed
In your dear little ear
You've got to be carefully taught.
You've got to be taught to be afraid
Of people whose eyes are oddly made,
And people whose skin is a diff'rent shade,
You've got to be carefully taught.
You've got to be taught before it's too late,
Before you are six or seven or eight,
To hate all the people your relatives hate,
You've got to be carefully taught!
To hate and fear,
You've got to be taught
From year to year,
It's got to be drummed
In your dear little ear
You've got to be carefully taught.
You've got to be taught to be afraid
Of people whose eyes are oddly made,
And people whose skin is a diff'rent shade,
You've got to be carefully taught.
You've got to be taught before it's too late,
Before you are six or seven or eight,
To hate all the people your relatives hate,
You've got to be carefully taught!
The most effective way to retrain the
brain to destroy the image of God in the human heart is to inculcate
the notion of a god who is more like what we want him to be like. And
why do we promote a god who is more like us than like Jesus? It is
because with a god to worship who reacts like we would toward those
who mistreat or hate us, we can feel justified in craving revenge or
in inflicting harsh punishments on others. Such a god allows us to
rationalize any number of horrific things we would normally find
impossible to vindicate should we allow Jesus to define the true God.
Our beliefs and perceptions about how
we are tempted directly reflect our views about God. Identify your
beliefs about what you think constitutes temptation for you, and you
have just strong clues as to your beliefs and opinions about the
nature of the god you believe is in charge of life.
Now, take that composite internal
picture of God as exposed by your ideas about temptation and compare
it closely with Jesus, with the way He treated people and what He
taught. This is the reality check that should force every one of us
to feel exposed by the incongruence between what we assume God is
like by how different He really is in the light of truth as it is
found in Jesus.
Let me give another example from my own
life that came to mind as I pondered this. I realize that one of my
temptations right now is to want to pour on anyone willing to listen
a barrage of spiritual information, things I am excited to learn
about recent discoveries in my own pursuit of truth. These are all
hopefully very good things, helpful things, maybe even necessary
things that people need to know. If they were not I should not want
to be sharing them or believing them myself.
The problem is not in that what I want
to share is false, the problem is much deeper. I am now seeing in
this weakness roots of remaining misperceptions I still feel about
how God relates to me. You see, I am more than eager to 'witness' to
others about what I am learning about God, how good He is and how
messed up are our ideas about Him that keep us afraid of Him
unnecessarily. But there is the darker side – I want to share all
these things to convince you that you need to believe these things
while at the same time I feel too intimidated to make myself
vulnerable to enter into a closer relationship with you where you
might gain opportunity to see me react in ways opposite to what I
claim God is like.
Do you see it yet? Many of us are
afraid to get too closer to each other for fear that others will see
our inconsistencies and judge us as hypocrites. It is much easier to
keep a safe distance while excitedly sharing intellectual
enlightenment that would be a blessing when applied in practical
life. Yet we fear risking looking like a fool if our own beliefs
should be tested by getting close to other messed up people that
might make us too uncomfortable. It is easier to remain in our
comfortable group to enjoy shared interests but not have to get too
close, where we can maintain safe boundaries to protect ourselves
from getting too exposed or getting hurt or having our faults seen
too obviously.
Ironically vulnerability is precisely
what Jesus demonstrated and lived out His entire time as a human in
our dangerous world. No wonder historians said that He was know to
frequently weep. This is not something most of us want to be known
for; we would prefer to have a Savior who makes life better for us,
more comfortable and to make us feel safer. Yet if we take a close
look at what Jesus said along with what He did, we discover that He
lived a very different life than what most of His professed followers
today live having nice churches, comfortable homes and keeping in
safe little cliques.
Now I feel challenged to face this
issue more directly and to become even more willing to get involved
in the messiness of broken lives around me to fulfill the teachings
of Jesus. Isn't that what it means to follow Him in serving others?
But my real question is, why do I feel this way? There must be
something deep inside of me that still believes that God is the way I
want Him to be. So as I allow myself to compare my temptation to what
my gut-level feelings may be telling me, I find that the god I have
believed in most of my life may in fact be very suspect compared with
Jesus.
Through much of my life what was
emphasized as most important in religion was to know the right
answers and to believe right doctrines. We isolated ourselves
to associate primarily only with those of our religious denomination.
The result is that I still don't know how to develop healthy
relationships with anyone who believes significantly different than
me. What I am now starting to see is that in reality this has been my
picture of God all these years, a God who puts greater emphasis on
being right than on caring, even though the content of that correct
information included instructions of how we were supposed to love our
enemies and minister to the poor and other things we feel
uncomfortable doing. But so long as we believed the right things it
seemed O.K. to lag far behind when it came to living them out in
everyday life, even though we were ready to criticize others who did
that very thing.
Now, just confessing this brings up
another tenacious problem I have related to God. To admit that I have
this fear about what others might think about me, or fears about
getting involved in the lives of people different than me arouses
guilt inside. A new fear then becomes what people will think of me if
I don't follow through now and address these faults I have just
confessed. I begin to discern here a very familiar pattern of relying
on guilt to motivate me which includes trying to avoid or assuage
guilt rather than living from motivations of sincere and genuine
love.
What I am trying to say is that in
recent years I am coming to realize that guilt has been possibly the
primary motivation keeping me in line with God's will for my life.
Guilt is related to fear; it is in fact fear of what God might do to
punish me if I do stay in line with His demands. For most of my life
guilt and shame have been so ever-present in my subconscious most of
the time that I find myself basing most of my decisions on how much
guilt I might experience on the other side or to escape current
guilt. Since the god I long believed in really had no ability to
awaken love in my heart for him, the only motivation that worked was
to get me to avoid doing bad things because of how guilty that would
make me feel, and I had far too much of that already.
Clearly the god I have worshiped and
obeyed so long is a god who relies mostly on guilt to manipulate me
into conforming to His rules. But in that relationship I could never
work up or discover the necessary love that this god also demanded of
me that I read about in the Bible. I could never figure out why all
this was so confusing until recent years as I began discovering that
the real God is different than what I had always thought. As my
awareness that God is much, much better than I had every been allowed
to think in the past began to take influence in my heart, I began
feeling strange new sensations of spontaneous love that had never
existed before – which started to get me very excited.
Yet these residual feelings of guilt
still remain and still assert themselves as being necessary for
keeping me in line should my love not yet be effective enough to
replace them. Maybe there is some truth in that line of logic, but so
long as my relationship with God is motivated by guilt avoidance and
lacking in genuine love and respect and admiration of His ways and
His character, I still remain trapped by old fears that nearly
suffocated the life out of me. It is time to again reject this false
god of my past, even the versions of God I inherited from my parents
and my church, to embrace the true God who is not at all like any
other gods. This is the God who loves me unconditionally which sets
me free to love Him in return without feeling that I have to earn it
in any way.
Now therefore revere the LORD, and
serve him in sincerity and in faithfulness; put away the
gods that your ancestors served beyond the River and in
Egypt, and serve the LORD. Now if you are unwilling to serve the
LORD, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your
ancestors served in the region beyond the River or the gods of the
Amorites in whose land you are living; but as for me and my
household, we will serve the LORD. (Joshua 24:14-15)
Now therefore
awe Yah Veh,
and serve him
in integrity and in truth:
and turn aside
the gods
(elohim) which your fathers served
on the other
side of the river,
and in Egypt;
and serve ye
Yah Veh.
And if it seem
evil unto you [wrong]
to serve the
LORD Yah Veh,
choose you this
day whom ever ye will serve;
whether the
gods (elohim) which your fathers served
that were on
the other side of the river,
or the gods
(elohim) of the Amorites,
in whose land
ye settle:
but as for me
and my house,
we will shall
serve Yah Veh.
(Joshua 24:14-15
ERRB)
What is becoming more clear to me now
is that one of the most effective ways to expose the core beliefs we
feel about God, which in turn directly affects the kind of life we
live and the way we relate to others, is through seeing our beliefs
about temptation as an indicator of less obvious beliefs that
conflict with what we profess. Temptations tell us a great deal more
about our real opinions about God than do our professions of faith
which can be very cerebral and disconnected from reality.
The good person out of the
good treasure of the heart produces good, and the evil
person out of evil treasure produces evil; for
it is out of the abundance of the heart that the
mouth speaks.
Why do you call me 'Lord, Lord,' and
do not do what I tell you? I will show you what
someone is like who comes to me, hears my words, and acts on them.
(Luke 6:45-47)
Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord,
Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does
the will of my Father in heaven. On that day many will say to me,
'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in
your name, and do many deeds of power in your name?' Then I will
declare to them, 'I never knew you; go away from
me, you evildoers.' (Matthew 7:21-23)
Jesus makes it clear here that it is
not sufficient to just believe that God exists. Clearly these people
who are confused over the outcome in the end question why they are
not included in the kingdom of God. They had been faithful and
zealous to do all the right things and have all the
right answers. Was their problem in that they did not believe
in God, or was it that the god they sincerely believed in was so
different from the God revealed by Jesus? They had refused to accept
that the god they worshiped and obeyed did not match up with the kind
of God that Jesus reveals, and in so doing so they experience a
terrible shock to discover that God was not at all like what they had
always believed.
God, after He spoke long ago to the
fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these
last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He
appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world.
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact
representation of His nature, and upholds all things by
the word of His power. (Hebrews 1:1-3 NAS95)
I have come to see that possibly the
most important decision we may ever make is to be willing to allow
our opinions and gut feelings about God be challenged and transformed
by a constantly increasing appreciation of the real God. This must
happen as we immerse ourselves in coming to know Jesus personally,
intimately and vulnerably and following His example in exposing
ourselves to others. Unless we become willing to admit that our
internal version of God is darkened from both religion and by our
selfish nature and is in serious need of upgrading, we will remain in
danger of finding ourselves among those people Jesus describes who
firmly believed they had it all right while in reality they were
tragically deceived about God but had refused to admit it.
Elijah then came near to all the
people, and said, "How long will you go limping with
two different opinions? If the LORD is God, follow him;
but if Baal, then follow him." The people did not answer him a
word. (1 Kings 18:21)
Baal was actually a god very similar to
what most Christians today believe about Jesus. Baal was taught as
having experienced a death and resurrection very much like Jesus. He
was considered the son of God and was the main benefactor who
provided needed rains and blessings on his followers. The main
difference between Baal and the true God of heaven was the issue of
appeasement, an issue most religious people today still assert is
true about God. Baal demanded appeasement to satisfy and divert his
anger in feeling offended by those who disobeyed him. And so long as
we hold to similar views of God in our own hearts we are still really
worshiping Baal rather than the true God of Elijah.
Elijah himself struggled to embrace a
fully accurate picture of God as was seen when he took things into
his own hands after his victory on Mount Carmel by engaging in
violence against his enemies. That is why Jesus is the only
safe picture of God found among any humans. God has promised to again
send the spirit of the prophet Elijah again in our day to finish
revealing what must be seen – a clear revelation of the true God
who not only is One not wanting to be appeased, but never resorts to
violence to get His way. This is the God that Jesus revealed all the
way to His death and is the same version of God that must be
reflected in the lives of all who become overcomers the same way
Christ overcame. This is the God who can heal the heart and empowers
His children to live from love alone and never from fear or guilt.
This is the God who restores all broken relationships that sin has
damaged. This is the version of God that we desperately need to take
to a world full of confusion, fear and despair. This is our God and
we must wait for this kind of God to save us.
Lo, I will send you the prophet
Elijah before the great and terrible day of the LORD comes. He will
turn the hearts of parents to their children and the hearts
of children to their parents, so that I will not come and
strike the land with a curse. (Malachi 4:5-6)
It will be said on that day, Lo,
this is our God; we have waited for him, so that
he might save us. This is the LORD for whom we have waited; let us be
glad and rejoice in his salvation. (Isaiah 25:9)
And it shall be
said in that day,
Lo Behold ,
this is our God Elohim ;
we have waited
for awaited him, and he will shall save us:
this is Yah
Veh; we have waited for awaited him,
we
will be glad, shall twirl and rejoice and cheer in his salvation.
(Isaiah 25:9 ERRB)
Comments
Post a Comment